One Brain or Two free essay sample

Many agreed to participate in the experiments. The experiments that they held focused on finding out what kind of limitations would each brain have if they operated independently, how the 5 senses would be affected as well as finding their unique abilities. The two hemispheres were analyzed with three different tests. One of the tests studied their visual abilities and interpretations. The test consisted on placing an image at a specific place while having their eyes fixed at a determined point.So that would make the patient capture the visual information in only one of the visual fields (area) of the right or left hemisphere. Interesting findings came out of this test. The patients claimed verbally to not have seen anything on the right field. However, when they were asked to point at the image seen, they pointed at the image on the right field where they had claimed to not have seen anything. We will write a custom essay sample on One Brain or Two? or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page These results lead Sperry and Gazzaniga to a logical conclusion: Our speech is controlled by the left hemisphere only.In other words, split-brain patients were not able to verbally express or even confirm what the right hemisphere has seen. Another of Gazzaniga and Sperry tests focused on tactile stimulation. This test was really simple. It consisted on being able to touch different items without seeing or hearing it. The results of this experiment give to the previous Gazzaniga and Sperry logical conclusion more credibility. At the time the patients used their right hands (connected to the left hemisphere), they could not name or describe verbally anything related to the objects.However, it was not the same story with the left hands of the patients (connected to the right hemisphere). They could match and point at the objects without problem; proving again the lack of speech ability that the right hemisphere has. The other test held was an auditory test. The test was done in two different ways. One way was finding the objects in a bag that were mentioned verbally and the other was identifying the item reached by touch. This test’s results were also supporting the previous researchers’ logical conclusion about the left hemisphere ability of speech.It confirmed the right hemisphere’s ability of comprehending language and its ability of expressing it in a nonverbal way. During the test, evidently, the right hemisphere had no trouble identifying the unknown objects by touch as the left hemisphere did. Moreover, some three- dimensional drawings of the slit-brain patients, who were all right handed, developed much better drawings using their left hands compared with their right hands. Those three types of tests were combined to make new tests. But the results are all similar to the ones mentioned before. These amazing findings get us to the conclusion that we possess two different brains with different abilities and behaviors. Gazzaniga emphasizes the possibility of doubling the brain’s performance by separating both halves. In other words, to put each brain half to think on their own. I find this hypothesis of perhaps being able to manage 2 tasks or having 2 extreme different thoughts at the same time very interesting. Knowing that something that sounds like fiction could actually be a possible truth one day provokes me countless thoughts about our so uncertain future.

Women AFL Essays - Equal Pay For Equal Work, Academic Disciplines

Women AFL Essays - Equal Pay For Equal Work, Academic Disciplines The AFL was founded in 1896, more than a century ago. The sport has gained millions of fans across the country; of all ages and genders. For more than a century, the league had only consisted of male players, but just recently (2017), the AFL had finally approved eight female teams to play their own season. Many AFL fans were delighted as women finally had the chance to be professional players in one of the most popular sports of Australia. But it was rather disappointing to most of these fans when they learned that these female teams would earn significantly less than male teams. Erin Riley, the writer of the opinion piece: There is no defence for failing to pay players in the AFL women's league a living', published by The Sydney Morning Herald on the 31st August 2016, brings up the several defences' that have been made about not giving the women's league equal pay and rebuts these excuses with their own arguments. Some of the points Riley raises about this issue include the history of women being excluded from the market, the fact that their current pay is not enough for a living, and how equal work should attain equal pay. The author uses techniques such as rhetorical questions, appeals to justice, statistics and imagery with an overall indignant tone. In contrast, a comment written by Adam contradicts Riley's arguments by declaring that the author's reasoning wouldn't have an impact as it had already been brought up before by many other sports. Adam mentions that even men have to work other jobs to earn their living as well and simply complaining about the pay gap won't change things unless proper action is taken. Adam uses a matter-of-fact tone to rebut Riley's arguments and utilises emotive language, repetition and logic to prove their point. Over the past century, men's sport has had to opportunity to grow to what it is today, with funding from the government. Riley mentions that women did not have the ability to receive fundings for sport because they were "actively excluded" from participating in them. Riley uses the statistic of "over more than 100 years," to remind readers of the handicap that men received; that women didn't. The writer also uses a rhetorical question: "Why shouldn't the women's league get the same opportunity?" followed by the concept of a "level playing field" to further point out the unfairness demonstrated towards women over time. This also appeals to the readers' sense of justice, that women should start being treated fairly now instead of following the decisions made in the past. Riley links their argument back to the issue by stating that, "The market for the women's competition fundamentally cannot develop the way the men's competition has." This connects to the point that professional female players need this extra pay to compensate for the fact they didn't have enough time to build up their reputation. Conversely, Adam states, "simply complaining that the men have it better is not going to get it done." Though this rebuts Riley's argument as a whole, it can also say that complaining about the past won't fix anything for the present. They add that this [complaining] "approach has proven to be massively unsuccessful for every professional women's league in the world." It is intended here to remind the opposition that their argument had already been gone through before, and it did not change anything. But following this, the writer mentions the successful campaigning of the WTA (Women's Tennis Association) "over a long period of time". This makes the opposition hopeful, but also reminds them that it takes time and effort if the AFL women's league wants to attain equal pay. This collocation of successful' and unsuccessful' gives the perception that the writer isn't comple tely against women receiving equal pay, therefore leading to have the readers agree with the writer because of its logic and relatively positive connotations. The entire issue of paying women the same amount of pay is not only because of equity, but mainly to allow them to pursue their passion full-time and earn a living at that as well. Riley argues that although it's a women's sport and the work load

Is it Possible for a Teacher to be Accountable without Being Essay

Is it Possible for a Teacher to be Accountable without Being Responsible - Essay Example This very link has been described and elaborated in respect to the ability of the teacher to balance the both, in this report. TEACHER’S RESPONSIBILITY The responsibility associated with an instructor is more than any other profession, as every profession demand education set of skills, which are only achieved once the person has undergone studies from a capable teacher, responsible enough to know his role in this world. Furthermore, Hartley (2002, 255) points out that a cheap, one-size-fits-all 'standard' in teacher education may turn out to be ineffective with regard to the promotion of human resources and the competitiveness of the economy in general. The knowledge treasure requires creativity, team-work and self-execution; the teacher being handed complete freedom to built a set of self-assessments and parameters of responsibility. These are the salient features of the modern education policy model which are highly unlikely to be promoted. Furthermore, along with the deman d for educators to conceive added responsibility, this feat is not as easy as it sounds. Therefore, attributing responsibility to a teacher is not a fact that can be gauges like temperature or any other quantitative material (Young 1998, 62). TEACHER’S ACCOUNTABILITY EFFECTS Does accountability affect building or correcting the mechanisms of an education system? This question remains a core debate in the education circles. A different perspective looked into the effects brought upon by the accountability of an educator. The effects study shed light upon the accountability systems, so to create better policy mechanisms, which in turn create a better system and professional excellence (Darling-Hammond &Sykes, 1999) and/or a system that has a reward/punishment setup for the teachers (Odden, 2002). In the modern era, research has shifted its focus from school politics to the performance analysis of the educators and the system in which they thrive. A new angle on accountability e merged as the policy makers shifted their attention on to the special role of teachers as it was before the fancy technology teaching methods took over (Fuhrman, 1999). This new form of observation by the policy makers is an effort towards enhancing the accountability of the educators, while they try to work on the areas of vigilance, observation, performance and open test results, making the system transparent. Critics of this current system; lobby hard for the old system their prime argument being the non-influential relationship between the performance of the teacher and performance of the students and their test-scores. The hard-line example for this fact is the statistics of increased dropout rate since the application of the test-driven policies, specially affecting those students who stood on the borderline of passing and failing (Whitford & Jones, 2000). This in turn has smashed the teacher’s morale in general (McNeil, 2000) and made it a difficult environment for the m as their performance is judged majorly through the stats of students, which more often than not is not the true picture. ACCOUNTABILITY VERSUS RESPONSIBILITY Accountability devices show the importance of decentralizing responsibility of a teacher. National educational authorities have decentralized the responsibility for teaching quality to the school running agencies, which more often than not creates a local accountability system, hence placing more responsibility on the teacher’